Saturday, March 9, 2019
How to Avoid Translation, Transaction and Economic Exposures
get down 1 Question a Provide examples of how real world transnational corporations (MNC) take their rendering, transaction and sparing exposures. Translation exposure is the effect of veers in ex metamorphose orders on the nibing values of financial statements (Shapiro, 2010, p. 356). The translation exposure arises from the conversion the financial statements denominated in conflicting funds from denominated in home currency. The MNCs could get their translation by using funds version. For an example, if the devaluation of USD is anticipate for a Chinese confederation.The company could usage direct funds adjustment such as pricing the exports in RMB and pricing the imports in USD, expend in RMB securities and replacing loanwords in RMB with the loans in USD. The company to a fault could use indirect funds adjustment as paying out dividens, fees and former(a) expends in advance, and speeding up the solelyowance of accounting payable and delaying the order of batt le of accounting receivable in USD. Transaction exposure measures the exchange gains and losses in capital flows in the value of domestic currency, which is denominated in unknown currency (Shapiro, 2010, p. 57). Multinational corporations lots lower transaction exposure by making the contract with bank to lock in a away exchange reckon. For an example, an Australian import company expected to pay to an Ameri fag end supplier 10000 USD for the goods half year later. The company could sign a forwarfared unconnected exchange which is fixed at 0. 9 AUD per USD, and it allows carrying on the transaction in contract provision deadline any time, take at that time exchange rate as. So if there would be wear and tear of home currency, and the Spot exchange rate is at 1. AUD per USD, the company had the redress to convert their AUD into USD at previous exchange rate which is at 0. 9 from bank, so the marrow of balance was the financial savings in cash flows. scotch exposure measur es the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on the run cash flows thorough the sales price, sales volume, and production speak to (Shapiro, 2010, p. 359). So the multinational corporations could reduce their stinting exposures by foodstuffing and production strategies.For an example, in the export business, if the currency is kookie in home country, the company should much revenue and profit from product pricing, and they should consider lower price by diminution cost of product, such as expanding their scope of cognitive operation for reducing the cost of production, shifting production to home for reducing cost of currency exchange. Conversely, if the home country supplies with hard currency, they could shift production to local with soft currency for reducing cost of production. Question bDefine the international debt, equity and bargain backing options available to MNCs. Explain why MNCs use these financing source. international debt financing refers to the fund demand ers credit behaviours of raising funds directly from the open by issuing various debt or stocks in the international perplex market (Shapiro, 2010, p. 464). There are two bods of foreign adhere. The first kind is the bonds denominated in the local currency that are issued in the national bond market, and the second kind is the bonds denominated in the home currency that are issued in the local bond market.The important foreign bonds in the world allow Yankee bonds of the US and Swiss franc bonds of Swiss, Samurai bonds of Japan and Bulldog Bond from the capital of the United Kingdom market. International debt financing can pretend multiple sources of capital from varied foreign markets. The international debt can be issued in a heavy(p) number with low cost, and MNCs only need to pay the interest as required and return the principal on the due date. The companys business condition has nothing to do with creditors and creditors cannot intervene with the companys management a nd operation.The management and decision-making are both subject to the discretion of the company itself. International equity financing refers to enterprises fund-raising by issuing stocks in the foreign markets (Shapiro, 2010, p. 466). Since stocks can only be transferred unblemishedly cannot be withdrawn, the capital raised by international stock financing is long-term capital. For the MNCs could benefit carve up of advantage of the International equity financing. Firstly, the international equity financing could reduce the funding risk.For some large MNCs located in the small countries, the market could not meet the need of huge issues, it is necessary to finance in more market. Then, issuing the overseas shares could attract more overseas investors, so there is an increase of demand for the companys shares, thereby the price of share would also increase and achieve the maximization of the wealth. Trade financing refers to the short-term financing or credit facility bidd by banks to importers or exporters in semblance to the settlement of import and export trade (Shapiro, 2010, p. 36). Trading financing is shared into import and export trade financing. In general, in respect of import financing, a garner of credit is adopted (Shapiro, 2010, p. 638). When the issuing bank has get proper and complete documents as required, the applicant makes the payment under the letter of credit to repay the short-term financing. The letter of credit is easy to die and makes the approval procedures of the administration of foreign exchange much simpler. At the corresponding time, a sight letter of credit is also used.As a result, importers can have access to the long-term letter of credit financing. The export concern financing could take a packing loan. Before exporting the goods specify in the letter of credit provided by the overseas importer, the packing loan is employed to cover the expenses of goods, materials, production and shipment. When the shipment of the goods is completed, the exporter presents all the documents to the negotiating bank for payment under the terms of the credit.Upon the receipt of the payment of goods, the packing loan should be paid back (Bank of China, 2012). Part 2 Briefly explain the differences between the foreign direct enthronements (FDI) and portfolio enthronisation funds funds. Then collect the required the data from the billet of Economic Analysis (BEA) website and answer the following questions Foreign direct enthronement refers to the trade activity of directly entering other countries for production by means of joint venture, sole proprietorship, etc (Shapiro, 2010, p. 198).With direct investment, investors can possess all or part of the enterprise assets and the ownership of operation, and directly perform or participate in the operation and management. Portfolio investment refers to the investment behaviours of purchasing financial securities of other countries to obtain certain proceeds (S hapiro, 2010, p. 198). Compared with direct investment, indirect investments investors only have the right to certain proceeds on a regular basis in addition to stock investment, but have no right to intervene with the invitees operation and management.Question a List the ten largest recipient countries of US FDI in the eld 1990, 2000 and 2010. You need to provide the list of countries as well as the amount of FDI in USD. pic Source U. S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) website. Question b What factors do you think account for these countries being the largest recipients of US FDI? Firstly, both these countries have hygienic political stability, because there are no changes of government and wars in recent, and the social condition and the rate of economic development of that country are positive.The positive political stability brings a safe investment purlieu to MNCs, which effectively enhances their confidence and entrustingness to invest. Secondly, these countries have rea sonable, normative and stable legal systems. The countries could provide enough defense for foreign investors. Then, these countries have a good economic outlook in their domestic such as the low inflation, balance-of-payment surpluses and the strong growth rate of per capita GDP. So, the positive economic spot, the less likely it is to present risk that will inevitably harm foreign companies (Shapiro, 2010, p. 30). Question c Has the list of recipient counties changed over the concerned period? What might account for these changes? Yes, the list has changed over the concerned period. For most MNCs, the political and economic risks whitethorn discourage investors to invest in the countries. Political risk refers to the possibility of create loss to investment activities of foreign investors because of the change in investment surround as a result of the change in the political situation of the host country (Shapiro, 2010, p. 277).Generally speaking, the main political risk fig ure outd on the investment decision which includes War Risk, when a political change or war occurs in the host country, it will bring damage to the sales or profits of foreign-funded enterprises in the host country and even endanger the endurance of these enterprises Legal risk, with the unreasonable laws and regulations and the direct legal confrontation between the investment country and host country, host country cannot provide enough shield for foreign investors, the assets of enterprises are more likely to suffer loss.Policy change risk, the change in policies concerning land, tax, market and exchange of the host country may influence the profits and development of enterprises. The government in the host country may set up barriers or impose various pressures for enterprises of the investment country, which often results in loss or bankruptcy for foreign-funded enterprises. Government relations risk, disharmonious government relations will lead to mutual hostility and sancti ons in economy.As a result, foreign-funded enterprises are the first to be affected, which fork outs great risk for investment and operating activities. Economic risk mainly stems from the change in the economic policies and economic situation of the host country (Shapiro, 2010, p. 277), which changes may strike the foreign-funded enterprises and generate risk for their investment and operation. The economic risk mainly includes Exchange rate risk, foreign investment activities often involve the conversion of different currencies.The change in exchange rate may increase the production cost, reduce the profitability of enterprises. Tax risk, the preference level of tax policy in the host country directly influences the management efficiency of enterprises. Interest rate risk, the fluctuation in the interest rate of the host country will have a direct impact on the financing cost and capital utilization efficiency of enterprises. Question d Do you extract a change to the 2010 list o ver the next decade? Explain.Yes, I think some countries in the Third World and easterly europium will come into the list. With the strong economic and growth and rising stock(a) of living, these emerging markets might be so profitable to the investors, and these host governments do recognise the free market oriented situation that it has play the use of goods and services of economic growth. In the past years, the Third Worlds and Eastern European countries are more open to the FDI by setting up free market oriented policies. These countries introduced a number of trade repose polices.In the free market system, prices and interest rate are set by market. The countries also have tax reform in the past years, that brought to foreign investors much more preferential taxation. They are accelerating the privatisation programme, it identified that government was uncoerced to accept and support private economic activities, which leads to advance the inflow of FDI. by and by that, th ese countries also are trying to move forward is to revamp the entire civil service which could provide enough preferential treatment and protection for foreign investors.References Bank of China, 2012, Packing Loan, International Trade Financing. Accessed on http//www. boc. cn/en/cbservice/cb3/cb35/200806/t20080627_1324121. html Shapiro, A. C. , 2010, Multinational Financial Management, 9th edn, John Wiley & Sons, New York, p. 198, p. 227, p. 230, p. 356, p. 357, p. 359, p. 464, p. 466, , p. 636, p. 638. U. S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2012, U. S. Direct Investment Position Abroad on a Historical-Cost Basis. picpicpicpicpicpic
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment